Tag Archives: LITA

Quality of Future Librarians – No need to worry!!

I originally wrote this post in 2005.  I am reposting it because it is even more true now than it was 6 years ago.  I have seen this with the adjunct librarians I have been working with at MYPOW and from the many posts I read via Twitter, Facebook, and now Google+.

 

I am serving on the LITA/SIRSI and LITA/Larew Scholarships Committee. I am extremely impressed with the credentials and motivations of the applicants for the various scholarships. While I will not comment on any individual, the majority of applicants are well qualified and well grounded in an ethic that reflects well on the future of the profession. I am also finding this experience of working on this committee to be very fullfilling and very positive. It is extremely difficult to select from such a strong group of applicants. I am no loonger concerned about our future librarians. We must now strive to make opportunities for them by providing employment and chances for advancement.

LITA-TER – REVIEW OF: Michael W. Lucas (2006). PGP & GPG: Email for the Practical Paranoid.

ALA |: “REVIEW OF: Michael W. Lucas (2006). PGP & GPG: Email for the Practical Paranoid. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press. (ISBN: 1593270712; 9781593270711). 216 pp. $24.95.

By Wilfred (Bill) Drew

This work is a how-to book on using Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) and GnuPG (GPG) to encrypt e-mail messages. PGP and GPG can be hard to set up and configure. Lucas’ goal is to provide instructions and assistance in doing that.

PGP & GPG includes an introduction, 11 chapters, two appendices, and an index. The introduction provides a general background on both software packages as well as a very interesting history of the development of PGP including legal issues.

Chapter 1, Cryptography Kindergarten, is of particular value to those, such as the reviewer, new to the world of cryptography. It explains hashes, public-key encryption, and digital signatures. This chapter also defines the terminology used in cryptography and encryption.

In the next chapter, Understanding OpenPGP, Lucas examines the OpenPGP standard released in 1998 by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). He explains the Web of Trust and parts of the technology involved in OpenPGP. He also discusses how to handle your key, get it signed or revoked, and the procedures for making it publicly available.

Chapters 3 and 4 provide detailed instructions on installing PGP or GnuPG. However, there is a major problem with Chapter 4, Installing GnuPG if your computer is on a Windows platform. It does not mention the package available at GPG4Win (http://www.gpg4win.org). It is much easier to install than using what is suggested in Chapter 4. The only problem is that all manuals are in German.

The Web of Trust, Chapter 5, examines how keys are related to each other, verification, and keysigning. Along with Chapters 6 and 7 where management of keys is discussed in PGP and GnuPG, this is perhaps the most valuable part of the book.

Chapters 8, 9,and 10 tells the reader how PGP and GPG interact with and are used in e-mail systems. Chapter 10, GnuPG and Email, is especially valuable for Windows users of Microsoft Outlook Express, Microsoft Outlook, and the open source email client Mozilla Thunderbird.

The last chapter of the book, Other OpenPGP Considerations, looks at many issues including where to store your private key. It also discusses other features found in various software packages written to supplement PGP and GPG. One concern does arise though. Lucas suggests storing your private key on a USB flash drive. What is to prevent someone from stealing a flash drive even if it is on your car key chain or in your watch?

Michael Lucas has written an excellent book that should be in every academic and public library. It contains an excellent index and also two appendices for the more skilled techno-geeks out there.

Wilfred (Bill) Drew is Associate Librarian, Systems and Reference at Morrisville State College Library.

Copyright TER LITA Library Technology Reviews © 2007 by Wilfred Drew. This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for noncommercial, educational, or scientific purposes, provided that the preceding copyright statement and source are clearly acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. For permission to reproduce or adapt this document or any part of it for commercial distribution, address requests to the author.

LJ: Do Libries Innovate?

LJ Newswire has a great post describing the “great debate” sponsored by LITA. I found this story presents a view of the debate not written about by others. I would like to hear from Andrew Pace, Karen Schneider, Joe Janes, and Stephen Abram on their view of its accuracy.

ALA 2007 roundup: stats, SPARC, Google, and innovation – Library Journal: “Do Libraries Innovate? Librarian Culture Comes in for Some Criticism

It was billed as the great debate, taking on a key question for libraries: Do libraries innovate? Sponsored by LITA (Library and Information Technology Association), the panel was moderated by Andrew Pace of North Carolina State University, and featured the University of Washington’s Joe Janes, SirsiDynix’s Stephen Abram, and blogger and library consultant Karen Schneider. While the panel was lively and drew its share of laughs, the serious question of whether libraries innovate drew a mixed response (with Abram saying no), and a rebuke to what the panel saw as an excessively negative librarian culture which doesn’t tolerate failure or encourage experimentation. “

LITA Blog » Blog Archive » Social Software Showcase, sponsored by BIGWIG

LITA Blog » Blog Archive » Social Software Showcase, sponsored by BIGWIG: “LITA BIGWIG (Blogs, Wikis, and Social Software IG) is pleased to present the first ever online, unconference at ALA Annual 2007. The Social Software Showcase will be occuring around and during Annual. We have gathered eleven librarians and leaders in the field to present on cutting edge technology and social software. Regardless of where you are in the world, you will have the opportunity to view and discuss the presentations on the official Social Software Showcase Wiki.”

LITA members — Time to Vote!!

It is time for LITA members to vote. I just did. I was disappointed in the lack of mention of Library 2.0 in any of the statements I read. I strongly endorse Andrew Pace for Vice President/President-Elect. He is the most qualified and will do the best job. Here is how I voted:

VICE-PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT-ELECT – VOTE FOR ONE
Currently 1 Selected.
Vote CheckedPACE, ANDREW K. PACE, ANDREW K.
Selected: 1

DIRECTOR-AT-LARGE – VOTE FOR TWO, For Three-Year term
Currently 2 Selected.
Vote CheckedPOULTER, DALE  POULTER, DALE
Vote CheckedSPIVEY, BARBARA  SPIVEY, BARBARA
Selected: 2

DIRECTOR –AT-LARGE – VOTE FOR ONE, For One-Year term
Currently 1 Selected.
Vote CheckedSTARR, KAREN J.   STARR, KAREN J.
Selected: 1

COUNCILOR – VOTE FOR ONE, for Three-Year term
Currently 1 Selected.
Vote CheckedFLOWERS, KAY A.   FLOWERS, KAY A.
Selected: 1

ADOPTION OF PROPOSED BYLAWS CHANGES – Amendments to Sections 1, 3, and 5 of Article VIII
Currently 1 Selected.
Vote CheckedYES YES
Selected: 1


Technorati tags:
,