Tag Archives: copyright

Copyright and Libraries

Copyright and Libraries

Embedded Link

From IFLA: New Webpages on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions
From an International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions Announcement: “IFLA has created a new set of webpages, dedicated to one of the most important policy issues which IFLA is currently dealing with — the issue of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. Copyright exceptions enable libraries to preserve and make available works. In many [...]

Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.

Wired goes Creative Commons for Photos

Wired goes Creative Commons for Photos

Reshared post from +Michael Sauers

Embedded Link

Wired.com photo policy: all staff-produced photos will now be Creative Commons licensed
Wired.com has a new photo policy: "Beginning today, we’re releasing all Wired.com staff-produced photos under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC) license and making them available in high-res format on a newly launched public Flickr stream." They've commemorated the event by releasing 50 of their archival images under the same terms, including this fab Jim Merithew shot from The Toy and Action Figure Museum. Bravo!

Wired.com Goes Creative Commons: 50 Great Images That Are Now Yours

Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.

Google Plus, Librarians, and Copyright

Below is an email exchange I just had with a librarian claiming that Google owns and has copyright of whatever you post on Google Plus.  It speaks for itself.  My response includes a lengthy quote from Google’s terms of use. The user clearly retains ownership and copyright. I have removed her name and email address from this post.  I am also having a hard time avoiding being snarky!  I have not edited her message in any way other than removing name and email address.

 

—–Her Original Message—–

From: J.Librarian
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 11:26 AM
To: Wilfred Drew

Subject: Re: Google Plus and Librarians

 

I wish I had saved the article to send you the link.  However I do remember it being a tech oriented publication and it quoted a few paragraphs from the terms that must be agreed to in order to use Google .  the wording very clearly stated that anything posted there became google’s property and it could,be used as is or altered and published elsewhere by Google.  it made me pull back from exploring it any further.  basically I felt that by agreeing to the terms, I would be giving up copyright to anything I posted there.

 

—–My response—–
From: Wilfred Drew
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 11:32 AM
To: ‘J.Librarian’
Subject: RE: [NYLINE] Google Plus and Librarians

That article is completely wrong and is offering a wrong view of Google’s policy. Read for yourself the pertinent sections from the terms of use.

9.4   Other than the limited license set forth in Section 11, Google acknowledges and agrees that it obtains no right, title or interest from you (or your licensors) under these Terms in or to any Content that you submit, post, transmit or display on, or through, the Services, including any intellectual property rights which subsist in that Content (whether those rights happen to be registered or not, and wherever in the world those rights may exist). Unless you have agreed otherwise in writing with Google, you agree that you are responsible for protecting and enforcing those rights and that Google has no obligation to do so on your behalf. 

11.   Content license from you

 11.1  You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services. 

11.2  You agree that this license includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services. 

11.3  You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this license shall permit Google to take these actions. 

11.4  You confirm and warrant to Google that you have all the rights, power and authority necessary to grant the above license.

 

Librarians, Premium Content, Copyright and Sharing

This morning I got a copy of a premium article ( pay for content) from the Chronicle of Higher Education via my email from one of the big library listservs I subscribe to.  This is a clear violation of copyright and I find it particularly alarming because it was sent out by a librarian.  The Chronicle allows some premium articles to be viewed for five days and after that time you must be a Chronicle subscriber to see it.  This particular article would be of interest to a large number of college and university librarians.  An email with the link to the article could have been sent to the list without any problem.  That is very easy to do and is encourage by the Chronicle.  Also, the Chronicle encourages sharing via Twitter, Facebook, Digg, Delicious, Mixx, and Reddit.

Librarians must be especially cognizant of copyright and publisher policies on sharing of articles.  The article I received was not just an excerpt of the first two or three paragraphs, it was the entire article.  The Chronicle makes many of its most important articles available for a five day period when they are first published.  Please do not abuse this privilege by sharing a complete article’s contents outside of your institution via a public forum such as a email list or blog.

Guide to Google Book Search Library Project Settlement

Association of Research Libraries :: Google Book Search Library Project
From the website: “Overview

On October 28, 2008, after several years of legal wrangling, Google, the Association of American Publishers (AAP), and the Authors Guild reached a settlement agreement concerning Google’s scanning of copyrighted works. The scanning of these works has been done in cooperation with research libraries throughout the United States. The settlement agreement requires court approval by the presiding judge in the U.S. District Court in New York because the case was brought as a class action suit on behalf of selected copyright owners.

In large part, the settlement focuses on in-copyright books that are not commercially available. Public domain works fall outside of the settlement and owners of commercially available, in-copyright books created prior to January 5, 2009, may opt-out of the settlement or opt-in to other terms with Google. As a part of the settlement agreement, Google will fund the establishment of the Book Rights Registry. The Registry, jointly run by authors and publishers, will collect and distribute royalties including an up-front payment by Google of $45 million. Users will have several new opportunities to access scanned books, both free and fee-based, via public and university libraries and through institutional subscriptions for academic, corporate, and government libraries and organizations.”

, , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.